Martha Lectures for Avenue A Razorfish Marketing Agency

September 18th, 2008


What are the best pre and post workout snacks? Where do “sneaky” calories pop up in NYC? What are energizing energy tips? These were some of the topics covered in my lecture on “Nutrition for the Active Person” which I presented at the Avenue A  I  Razorfish  Marketing Agency this past week. This company sponsers the Avenue A  I  Razorfish cycling team. Several of the team members were also in the audience, including Andrew Babaian, (Presentation Layer Architect) and Mary-Anne Williams (User Experience Director) (pic is of myself, Niko, Mary-Anne, and Andrew). 

I was invited to give this presentation by Niko Triantafillou, who is the health Promotion manager at a fortune 100 company, as well as a member of the team. (Pic on the right is a flyer on my lecture.

   

Here were some of the topics I spoke about in “Nutrition Tips for the Active Person“.

 

- sensible meals to facilitate weight loss
- best pre and post workout snacks
- sneaky NYC calories
- what are the best lunch choices
- low fat or low carb: which is best
- energizing eating tips

 

All attendees were eligible for prizes including: Nutrition books, Pedometers and other health related items Overall, it was a fun lecture. It was well attended and the participants were very interested in learning about a healthy energizing diet. (pic is of Niko and myself).

 

BTW - Avenue A Razorfish was voted the Best Place to Work by Outside Magazine!     

(pic is of Razorfish  team member)  

Give the Gift of Health this Holiday Season!


Share This Tags: , ,

Related posts



Comparison of Heart Rate Monitors to Caloric Burn on Cardio Machines.

August 14th, 2008
Posted in Wellness | 1 Comment »

I recently bought a heart rate monitor. I do a lot of and thought it would be a good training tool. I love it! But it brought something to my attention that I find a bit confusing. First, a little info for those of you who don’t have heart rate monitors… in addition to telling you what your heart rate is and if you are in your training zone, it also tells you how many calories you have burned in your workout sessions. You have to enter some data (i.e.  your weight, age, height, etc.) into the watch so it is individualized to you.

So here is my question…  I noticed a huge discrepancy in what the cardio machines at the gym say as compared to what the heart rate monitor says regarding caloric burn. For example, I ran 4 miles on the . After plugging in my weight, the said I burned off 400 calories, yet my heart rate monitor said I only burned 250. This is 40% lower! I tried the stairmaster (the more difficult one with rotating stairs) and found the same thing - my heart rate monitor said I burned about 30-40% fewer calories than what my heart rate monitor said. I found this very confusing (and annoying!) so I decided to turn to two fitness experts -  Sal Salvatore Fichera, MS, Exercise Physiologist and author of Stop Aging, Start Training and Julia Derek, fitness instructor in NYC.

Martha: So why the huge difference between my heart rate monitor and what the cardio machines at the gym said regarding caloric burn?
 
Sal: Good question. Cardio machines provide merely estimates. The more highly accurate guage is the HR monitor, which is nearly as accurate as an EKG (electrocardiogram).
 
Whereas cardio machines provide estimates based on averages (derived merely from total body weight, and not body fat composition), the HR monitors actually measure the electricity generated by the heart in real time.  

Derek: referred me to the article she wrote on accuracy of calorie counters on cardio machines that I recently posted on CGB. In addition to the info in the article, she also agreed that the heart rate monitors are more accurate.

I would invite all CGB readers who have heart rate monitors to test this out. Compare your monitor reading to the reading on the cardio machine at your gym and share the results.

So bottom line, you may not be burning as many calories as you think you are when you exercise - so think twice before grabbing that extra cookie or glass of wine!

Give the Gift of Health this Holiday Season!


Share This Tags: , , ,

Related posts



Are the Calorie Counters on Cardio Machines Accurate?

July 21st, 2008
Posted in Wellness | 1 Comment »

I have often wondered whether the calorie counters on the treadmills, bikes or eliptical machines at my gym are accurate. Why do I burn so many calories on the as compared to the or - where I feel I am working so much harder?

I have many clients who gleefully report they burned off 600 calories in their morning eliptical session. I bet in the back of their minds, they are giving themself permisson for some extra “nourishment”. But I always left wondering if they are really burning this amount of calories. So the question is, are these calorie counters accurate???

I had planned on picking “ the fitness trainer’s” brain over cocktails at my birthday party, but happened to receive her newsletter that day answering my question. We still talked shop, amoung other things (you probably guess what that was) over cocktails. (Pic is of Martha and at my bday party discussing calories burned)

So here is an excerpt from Julia’s newsletter:

 Question from Jennifer: Hi, my name is Jennifer and I’m a 36-year-old travel agent. About five times a week I come to the gym and do a cardio machine. Sometimes I use the elliptical and sometimes I use the stationary . The on these machines give me different readings even though I spend about the same time on each (30-40 minutes). The elliptical says that I have burned 450 calories and the says usually around 300. It feels to me as though I’m working out with the same intensity on both machines. So how can it be different? Is one more correct than the other?

 
Answer from : Jennifer, thanks for this great question! I often get this question and used to wonder about it myself in the early days of my career. I’m going to answer your last question first, if the calorie counters are correct or not. It might surprise some people to hear this, but they are actually quite correct - as long as there are features attached to the counter (and you use these!) such as age and weight, and you use the machine the way it was designed. For example, you’re not supposed to use the handles of the machine to lean on, only to lightly grasp in order to maintain your balance. I assume that you do use the machine’s features because if you don’t, the counters are not accurate. Weight bearing machines like the elliptical and the are more accurate than non-weight bearing machines like the stationary as these machines takes the pressure of your body weight into account. These machines also measure the speed you’re going, unlike the stationary , which only includes the distance and time of your workout in calculatinng calories burnes. The formula that bikes and ergometers use depends on an “average rpm speed,” usually 70 rpm (revolutions per minute). So the only variables in the equation are the level of intensity — meaning the resistance you are pedaling against — and the time you spent working out. With most stationary bikes you will find that if you for 10 minutes at 50 rpm, 70 rpm and then 90 rpm, the number of calories you burned at each of the different speeds are all the same or very close.
It’s important to keep in mind that most cardio machines over estimate calories burned by about 10-15%, in some cases up to 25%. Generally, the newer the machine, the less it will over estimate as its calibration won’t be set off by time and use. Keep this mind when you look at the afterwards. Another important factor to keep in mind is that the machine doesn’t take your body composition into account. A woman weighing 140 pound with 18% body fat will have burned more calories than a 140-pound woman with 30% body fat. The reason for this is because muscles use up more energy (calories) than body fat. To get the most accurate reading, make sure a person with experience in using the caliper method, usually an experienced trainer, measures you. Unfortunately, this method doesn’t work well for people with a lot of belly fat (think beer guts of aging men). People who carry most of their body fat in one area are better off going to a facility that measures people’s body fat under water. This is considered the most exact body fat measurement. Of course, if you have so much fat around your belly that it is impossible for the calipers to grip it, it’s quite clear that you are not mostly muscle and therefore can safely assume that your body fat percentage will be high…

You need to also be aware of that if you use the same machine over and over the same way, you’re most likely burning less and less calories even though the stays the same. This is because your body gets used to the motion and intensity and becomes a more effective energy expender, effective as in using up fewer calories.

Take home message: Weight-bearing cardio machines such as treadmills and ellipticals are more likely to accurately account for calories burned. The newer the machine, the more accurate the reading. If your body fat is low (you are very lean) and you put in your personal data correctly, the reading is probably almost dead on accurate. If not, subtract 15 % of calories burned. Last, switch machines often to avoid getting used to one machine! 

********* Martha will be asking a very perplexing question regarding the comparison between heart rate monitors and the calorie counters on the machines. SO - GET YOUR THINKING CAP ON. I THINK WILL ALSO ASK SAL, EN EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGIST AND NEW CONTRIBUTOR TO MY BLOG THE SAME QUESTION.  Boy this is “ week” on my blog - she has been featured this week on some level 3 times!

Give the Gift of Health this Holiday Season!


Share This Tags: , , , ,

Related posts



Martha and Friends on a 100 Mile Bike Ride

June 27th, 2008
Posted in Wellness | No Comments »

If any of you city girls and guys are looking for a great way to burn calories, see new places, spend time outside and meet new people, take up ! I have been into for the past 6 years or so and usually spend at one weekend day doing a long . This past Saturday, my friends and I decided to sign up for the ride to Montauk. You had a choice of 30 miles, 66 miles, 100 miles or 145 miles. Since we weren’t completely insane, we bypassed the 145 mile and signed up for the 100 mile .

This  started in Babylon, N.Y. The hardest part (aside from having a sore butt from sitting on the seat for 7 hours) was getting up at 4:45 am to make it to Babylon for the 7 am check in. This was tough for an like myself. Seems like I was just starting to fall asleep when my alarm went off!

Highlights of the :
1. Great food at the rest stops - especially the stop at the 70 mile mark where homemade pies were served. Delicious! (Pic is of Martha and John enjoying their second piece of )Here was some of the food that was served:
 - Homemade from legendary Briermere Farms, along with fresh whipped cream that is made on the spot
 - The famous Clovervale Bars — peanut butter and jelly spread on two graham crackers.  (It comes wrapped like an ice cream sandwich so you can put it in your pocket and !) 
 - Hummus with Pita (for those who want extra protein in the middle of the
 - Ice cream
- Artisan whole-grain breads from  
 - Fresh fruit
-  
- from . Biscotti. Muffins from Yura Bakery. Pound cake in a half-dozen different flavors from La Bonne Boulangerie.
- Gatorade and water, of course

2. Very scenic
3. Ended the with more food and free beer.  Nothing better than having a few cold ones after 7 hours in the seat!
4. Biking 100 miles burns a ton of calories. My heart rate monitor said I burned 2150 calories. Quite a bit of these calories were consumed at the rest stops…
5. Last, but certainly not least, free massages after the . (Pic is of cyclist Tom C. getting a much needed massage in the “seat” area)

Give the Gift of Health this Holiday Season!


Share This Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts